This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0963662507085163v1 18/5/498    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Burri, R. V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Coping with uncertainty: assessing nanotechnologies in a citizen panel in Switzerland

Regula Valérie Burri is an associated research scholar at Collegium Helveticum of ETH, Switzerland

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

	Abstract

The policy shift towards "upstream public engagement" requires dealing with a lack of individual and stabilized scientific knowledge that accompanies any early stage of research and development. This article examines how actors cope with this epistemic uncertainty when deliberating emerging technologies. Analyzing the arguments of the participants in a Swiss citizen panel on nanotechnology, the article explores how actors form their opinions in an epistemically nonstabilized situation. The article shows how actors develop a strategy to handle this situation: analogies, such as to other risk technologies or "nature," and personal experiences as patients and consumers are used as interpretive patterns and serve as tools to cope with the unknown. Focusing on the ways uncertainty is handled, this approach is differentiated from other models to explain public attitudes toward emerging technologies, such as the "scientific literacy model" or the "cognitive miser model."

Key Words: nanotechnology, nanoscience, risk, uncertainty, upstream engagement, public attitudes, citizens, cultural perception

First published on January 16, 2009, doi:10.1177/0963662507085163

Public Understanding of Science 2009;18:498.

A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?