This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0963662508096779v1 18/6/653    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Park, J. Articles by Logan, R. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Korean press and Hwang's fraud

¹ Jaeyung Park is Associate Professor at the School of Journalism & Mass Communication, Korea University, South Korea
² Hyoungjoon Jeon is a Research Professor at the Dankook Center for Dispute Resolution, Dankook University, South Korea
³ Robert A. Logan Ph.D. is a social science analyst and senior staff member at the US National Library of Medicine

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

	Abstract

This case study explores why South Korean journalists overlooked allegations of scientific misconduct against South Korean scientist Dr. Woo Suk Hwang and even indirectly defended him in 2005–6. Nineteen journalists, who covered Hwang's story for five of South Korea's leading daily newspapers, were interviewed. The interviewees added insights about the news coverage of the Hwang scandal not identified in previous literature, such as the difficulties among journalists to suspend their personal disbelief about the criticisms and evidence against Hwang. The findings suggest the news judgments that occurred in Korean newsrooms during the Hwang scandal reflected a socially constructed process of negotiation among news media professionals and between journalists and scientists. The findings also suggest it may be best to consider journalistic mores within a multidimensional framework that includes journalistic perceptions of socio-cultural norms, internal newsroom standards for evidence, newsroom competence and training, normative journalism ethics, news gathering techniques, perceived dissonance and professed risk avoidance.

Key Words: Woo Suk Hwang, news judgment, public understanding of science, science journalism, scientific fraud, South Korea

First published on February 16, 2009, doi:10.1177/0963662508096779

Public Understanding of Science 2009;18:653.

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?