Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Understanding of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andreasen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Two stories about biotech patenting from the "silent majority" in Europe

Morten Andreasen*

Danish Agency of Science, Technology and Innovation

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: moan{at}fi.dk.


   Abstract
Two decades of intensive policy controversy over the patenting of biotechnological inventions have left largely unexamined what the general public in Europe believes to be at stake. The paper presents the first European interview data with a primary focus on how members of "the silent majority"; understand biotech patenting. Group discussions witness a polarization involving contrasting views of the role of patents in society; first, a libertarian view focusing on e.g. rights and merit; second, a communitarian view focusing on e.g. equality and public welfare. I suggest that these positions, which have long historical roots, are expressions of more fundamental ideas about what "Good Society" is.

First published on May 12, 2009
Public Understanding of Science 2009, doi:10.1177/0963662509102688


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?