Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Understanding of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewenstein, B. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The meaning of `public understanding of science' in the United States after World War II

Bruce V. Lewenstein

Departments of Communication and Science & Technology Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

In the United States after World War II, the term `public understanding of science' became equated with `public appreciation of the benefits that science provides to society'. This equation was the result of the independent, but parallel, social and institutional needs of four different groups with an interest in popularizing science: commercial publishers, scientific societies, science journalists, and government agencies. A new, more critical era of popular science began in the 1960s.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 1, No. 1, 45-68 (1992)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/1/1/009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. Kurath and P. Gisler
Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio- and nanotechnology
Public Understanding of Science, September 1, 2009; 18(5): 559 - 573.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
K. H. Nielsen
In quest of publicity: the science--media partnership of the Galathea Deep Sea Expedition from 1950 to 1952
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2009; 18(4): 464 - 480.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. Powell and D. Lee Kleinman
Building citizen capacities for participation in nanotechnology decision-making: the democratic virtues of the consensus Conference model
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2008; 17(3): 329 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
Kristian Hvidtfelt Nielsen
Enacting the social relations of science: historical (anti-)boundary-work of Danish science journalist Borge Michelsen
Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2008; 17(2): 171 - 188.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
S. G. Terzian and A. L. Grunzke
Scrambled eggheads: ambivalent representations of scientists in six Hollywood film comedies from 1961 to 1965
Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2007; 16(4): 407 - 419.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
R. Slayton
Discursive Choices: Boycotting Star Wars Between Science and Politics
Social Studies of Science, February 1, 2007; 37(1): 27 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. W. Bauer, N. Allum, and S. Miller
What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2007; 16(1): 79 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
S. Kyvik
Popular Science Publishing and Contributions to Public Discourse among University Faculty
Science Communication, March 1, 2005; 26(3): 288 - 311.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
R. A. LOGAN
Science Mass Communication: Its Conceptual History
Science Communication, December 1, 2001; 23(2): 135 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Written CommunicationHome page
C. BAZERMAN
Nuclear Information: One Rhetorical Moment in the Construction of the Information Age
Written Communication, July 1, 2001; 18(3): 259 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
R. A. LOGAN, P. ZENGJUN, and N. F. WILSON
Science and Medical Coverage in the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post: A Six-Year Perspective
Science Communication, September 1, 2000; 22(1): 5 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
S. C. Zehr
Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change
Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2000; 9(2): 85 - 103.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
J. D. Miller
The measurement of civic scientific literacy
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 1998; 7(3): 203 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. Bucchi
When scientists turn to the public: alternative routes in science communication
Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 1996; 5(4): 375 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]