This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Friedman, S. M. Articles by Egolf, B. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Chernobyl coverage: how the US media treated the nuclear industry

Department of Journalism and Communication at Lehigh University, University Center #29, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA

Carole M. Gorney

Lehigh University

Brenda P. Egolf

Lehigh University, University Center #29, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA

This study attempted to uncover whether enough background information about nuclear power and the nuclear industries in the USA, USSR and Eastern and Western Europe had been included during the first two weeks of US coverage of the Chernobyl accident so that Americans would not be misled in their understanding of and attitudes toward nuclear power in general. It also sought to determine if reporters took advantage of the Chernobyl accident to attack nuclear technology or the nuclear industry in general. Coverage was analysed in five US newspapers and on the evening newscasts of the three major US television networks. Despite heavy coverage of the accident, no more than 25% of the coverage was devoted to information on safety records, history of accidents and current status of nuclear industries. Not enough information was provided to help the public's level of understanding of nuclear power or to put the Chernobyl accident in context. However, articles and newscasts generally balanced use of pro- and anti-nuclear statements, and did not include excessive amounts of fear-inducing and negative information.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 1, No. 3, 305-323 (1992)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. A. LOGAN Science Mass Communication: Its Conceptual History Science Communication, December 1, 2001; 23(2): 135 - 163. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. A. LOGAN, P. ZENGJUN, and N. F. WILSON Science and Medical Coverage in the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post: A Six-Year Perspective Science Communication, September 1, 2000; 22(1): 5 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. P. Peters The credibility of information sources in West Germany after the Chernobyl disaster Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 1992; 1(3): 325 - 343. [Abstract] [PDF]