Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Understanding of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Long, M.
Right arrow Articles by Thayer, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Gender and racial counter-stereotypes in science education television: A content analysis

M. Long

Colorado State University, USA

G. Boiarsky

Colorado State University, USA

G. Thayer

Hewlett-Packard, USA

This study analyzes characters in four children's science education television programs. Results indicated that these programs presented some counter-stereotypical images of scientists and people interested in science. Males and females were equally likely to be scientists, and they were on screen for the same amount of time per episode. Also, status, as measured by clothing worn and character knowledge, did not differ by gender or ethnicity. However, improvements are needed. Male characters significantly outnumbered female characters. Males generally were adults but females were equally likely to be adults or youths. Finally, minorities were significantly less likely to be labeled as scientists, minority scientists spent much less time on screen than did Caucasian scientists, and there were significantly fewer minority characters than Caucasian characters. Data are also presented on the differences in how main and visitor characters are portrayed.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 10, No. 3, 255-269 (2001)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/10/3/301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
M. S. Schafer
From Public Understanding to Public Engagement: An Empirical Assessment of Changes in Science Coverage
Science Communication, June 1, 2009; 30(4): 475 - 505.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
J. Steinke, M. K. Lapinski, N. Crocker, A. Zietsman-Thomas, Y. Williams, S. H. Evergreen, and S. Kuchibhotla
Assessing Media Influences on Middle School Aged Children's Perceptions of Women in Science Using the Draw-A-Scientist Test (DAST)
Science Communication, September 1, 2007; 29(1): 35 - 64.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
J. Steinke
Cultural Representations of Gender and Science: Portrayals of Female Scientists and Engineers in Popular Films
Science Communication, September 1, 2005; 27(1): 27 - 63.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
B. V. Lewenstein
Editorial: A decade of Public Understanding
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2002; 11(1): 1 - 4.
[PDF]