This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Shaw, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

"It just goes against the grain." Public understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in the UK

University of Bristol, AlisonShaw{at}bristol.ac.uk

This paper reports on one aspect of qualitative research on public understandings of food risks, focusing on lay understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in a UK context. A range of theoretical, conceptual, and empirical literature on food, risk, and the public understanding of science are reviewed. The fieldwork methods are outlined and empirical data from a range of lay groups are presented. Major themes include: varying "technical" knowledge of science, the relationship between knowledge and acceptance of genetic modification, the uncertainty of scientific knowledge, genetic modification as inappropriate scientific intervention in "nature," the acceptability of animal and human applications of genetic modification, the appropriate boundaries of scientific innovation, the necessity for GM foods, the uncertainty of risks in GM food, fatalism about avoiding risks, and trust in "experts" to manage potential risks in GM food. Key discussion points relating to a sociological understanding of public attitudes to GM food are raised and some policy implications are highlighted.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 11, No. 3, 273-291 (2002)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/11/3/305


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. C. Gamble Guardians of our future: New Zealand mothers and sustainable biotechnology Public Understanding of Science, March 1, 2009; 18(2): 189 - 198. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. J. Knight Perceptions, Knowledge and ethical concerns with GM foods and the GM process Public Understanding of Science, March 1, 2009; 18(2): 177 - 188. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S.J. Cherryman, S. King, F.R. Hawkes, R. Dinsdale, and D.L. Hawkes An exploratory study of public opinions on the use of hydrogen energy in Wales Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2008; 17(3): 397 - 410. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Gamble and E. Kassardjian The use of selected community groups to elicit and understand the values underlying attitudes towards biotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2008; 17(2): 245 - 259. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Schibeci and J. Harwood Stimulating authentic community involvement in biotechnology policy in Australia Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 245 - 255. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Hansen Tampering with nature: 'nature' and the 'natural' in media coverage of genetics and biotechnology Media Culture Society, November 1, 2006; 28(6): 811 - 834. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Rodriguez Talking brains: a cognitive semantic analysis of an emerging folk neuropsychology Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2006; 15(3): 301 - 330. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. McClean and A. Shaw From Schism to Continuum? The Problematic Relationship Between Expert and Lay Knowledge--An Exploratory Conceptual Synthesis of Two Qualitative Studies Qual Health Res, July 1, 2005; 15(6): 729 - 749. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Coyle and J. Fairweather Space, time and nature: exploring the public reception of biotechnology in New Zealand Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2005; 14(2): 143 - 161. [Abstract] [PDF]