This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Condit, C. M. Articles by Harris, T. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Lay understandings of the relationship between race and genetics: Development of a collectivized knowledge through shared discourse

Department of Speech Communication at the University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, ccondit{at}uga.edu

Roxanne Parrott

Department of Communication Studies at Pennsylvania State University

Tina M. Harris

Department of Speech Communication, at the University of Georgia

Throughout the past century, research into human genetics revealed the relationships between biochemistry and various human characteristics in increasing detail. At each step of this path of discovery, social critics warned that knowledge of genetics, and especially social attention to genetics, might heighten racist attitudes. In light of these warnings and the recent sequencing of the Human Genome, it is important to inquire into the interpretations laypersons might hold of the relationship between race and genetics. A variety of recent efforts have described the insufficiency of public opinion polls for arriving at sophisticated understandings of such complex attitudinal structures. Therefore, this essay offers a sketch of some lay understandings of race and genetics in the United States based on a series of focus group sessions. In order to interpret the responses, the analysis employs a novel template for interpreting focus group research based on the theoretical concept of rhetorical formations. This approach reveals the way in which the knowledge of individual members is brought to bear upon collective decision-making through the social process of discussion to produce a pool of information that is similar to expert knowledge, although phrased in a popular vocabulary. Differences in the ways in which cultural groups negotiate this knowledge are discussed.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 11, No. 4, 373-387 (2002)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/11/4/305


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Hwang and B. G. Southwell Can a Personality Trait Predict Talk About Science?: Sensation Seeking as a Science Communication Targeting Variable Science Communication, December 1, 2007; 29(2): 198 - 216. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Libutti and A. Valente Science communication and information dissemination: the role of the information professional in the 'Perception and Awareness of Science' project Journal of Information Science, April 1, 2006; 32(2): 191 - 197. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. R. Bates Public culture and public understanding of genetics: a focus group study Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2005; 14(1): 47 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF]