Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Understanding of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (48)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sturgis, P.
Right arrow Articles by Allum, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes

Patrick Sturgis

Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UKp.sturgis{at}surrey.ac.uk

Nick Allum

Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UKn.allum{at}surrey.ac.uk

The "deficit model" of public attitudes towards science has led to controversy over the role of scientific knowledge in explaining lay people’s attitudes towards science. In this paper we challenge the de facto orthodoxy that has connected the deficit model and contextualist perspectives with quantitative and qualitative research methods respectively. We simultaneously test hypotheses from both theoretical approaches using quantitative methodology. The results point to the clear importance of knowledge as a determinant of attitudes toward science. However, in contrast to the rather simplistic deficit model that has traditionally characterized discussions of this relationship, this analysis highlights the complex and interacting nature of the knowledge— attitude interface.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 13, No. 1, 55-74 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0963662504042690
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
H. Liu and S. Priest
Understanding public support for stem cell research: media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors
Public Understanding of Science, November 1, 2009; 18(6): 704 - 718.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
D. Brossard, D. A. Scheufele, E. Kim, and B. V. Lewenstein
Religiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology
Public Understanding of Science, September 1, 2009; 18(5): 546 - 558.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. Kurath and P. Gisler
Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio- and nanotechnology
Public Understanding of Science, September 1, 2009; 18(5): 559 - 573.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Current SociologyHome page
L. Culley and N. Hudson
Constructing Relatedness: Ethnicity, Gender and Third Party Assisted Conception in the UK
Current Sociology, March 1, 2009; 57(2): 249 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
G. Meisenberg
Designer babies on tap? Medical students' attitudes to pre-implantation genetic screening
Public Understanding of Science, March 1, 2009; 18(2): 149 - 166.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
N. Hudson, L. Culley, F. Rapport, M. Johnson, and A. Bharadwaj
"Public" perceptions of gamete donation: a research review
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2009; 18(1): 61 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
D. Yeomans and F. Drake
'Public psychiatry': a challenge for the profession?: INVITED COMMENTARY ON... 'PUBLIC PSYCHIATRY'
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., September 1, 2008; 14(5): 347 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
C. R. Critchley
Public opinion and trust in scientists: the role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2008; 17(3): 309 - 327.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. J. Martin-Sempere, B. Garzon-Garcia, and J. Rey-Rocha
Scientists' motivation to communicate science and technology to the public: surveying participants at the Madrid Science Fair
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2008; 17(3): 349 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. Powell and D. Lee Kleinman
Building citizen capacities for participation in nanotechnology decision-making: the democratic virtues of the consensus Conference model
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2008; 17(3): 329 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
S. R. Davies
Constructing Communication: Talking to Scientists About Talking to the Public
Science Communication, June 1, 2008; 29(4): 413 - 434.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
N. Allum, P. Sturgis, D. Tabourazi, and I. Brunton-Smith
Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2008; 17(1): 35 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
S. Turner
School science and its controversies; or, whatever happened to scientific literacy?
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2008; 17(1): 55 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Studies of ScienceHome page
R. Evans and A. Plows
Listening Without Prejudice?: Re-discovering the Value of the Disinterested Citizen
Social Studies of Science, December 1, 2007; 37(6): 827 - 853.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. C. Nisbet and R. K. Goidel
Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: bridging the ethnographic survey research divide
Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2007; 16(4): 421 - 440.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
N. Young and R. Matthews
Experts' understanding of the public: knowledge control in a risk controversy
Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 123 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Discourse SocietyHome page
C. Hamilton, S. Adolphs, and B. Nerlich
The meanings of 'risk': a view from corpus linguistics
Discourse Society, March 1, 2007; 18(2): 163 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
H.-S. Kim
PEP/IS: A New Model for Communicative Effectiveness of Science
Science Communication, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 287 - 313.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
W. Wagner
Vernacular science knowledge: its role in everyday life communication
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2007; 16(1): 7 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. W. Bauer, N. Allum, and S. Miller
What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2007; 16(1): 79 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
F. Drake
Mobile phone masts: protesting the scientific evidence
Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2006; 15(4): 387 - 410.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
N. Wright and B. Nerlich
Use of the deficit model in a shared culture of argumentation: the case of foot and mouth science
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2006; 15(3): 331 - 342.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. Ratto
Foundations and profiles: splicing metaphors in genetic databases and biobanks
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2006; 15(1): 31 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
P. N. Mwale
Societal deliberation on genetically modified maize in southern Africa: the debateness and publicness of the Zambian national consultation on genetically modified maize food aid in 2002
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2006; 15(1): 89 - 102.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. Fisher, B. Small, H. Roth, M. Mallon, and B. Jerebine
What do individuals in different science groups within a life sciences organization think about genetic modification?
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2005; 14(3): 317 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
S. C. Sanderson, J. Wardle, and S. Michie
The effects of a genetic information leaflet on public attitudes towards genetic testing
Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2005; 14(2): 213 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. Levitt, K. Weiner, and J. Goodacre
Gene Week: a novel way of consulting the public
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2005; 14(1): 67 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
R. Pardo and F. Calvo
The Cognitive Dimension of Public Perceptions of Science: Methodological Issues
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2004; 13(3): 203 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]