This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (28) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gaskell, G. Articles by Veltri, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Imagining nanotechnology: cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States

Methodology Institute, London School of Economics, London WC2A 2AE, UKg.gaskell{at}lse.ac.uk

Toby Ten Eyck

Sociology Department and National Food Safety and Toxicology Center at Michigan State University

Jonathan Jackson

Methodology Institute at the London School of Economics

Giuseppe Veltri

This paper compares public perceptions of technologies in the United States and Europe. Asked whether nanotechnology will improve our way of life, 50 percent of the US sample say "yes" and 35 percent say "don’t know." The European figures are almost the mirror image, 29 percent saying "yes" and 53 percent saying "don’t know." People in the US are also more optimistic than Europeans about eight more familiar technologies. We suggest that people in the US assimilate nanotechnology within a set of pro-technology cultural values. By contrast, in Europe there is more concern about the impact of technology on the environment, less commitment to economic progress and less confidence in regulation. These differences in values are reflected in media coverage, with more emphasis on the potential benefits of nanotechnology in the US than in the UK. Finally, we speculate on possible futures for the reception of nanotechnology in the US and Europe.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 14, No. 1, 81-90 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0963662505048949


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Gordon Learning From Fiction: Applications in Emerging Technologies Bulletin of Science Technology Society, December 1, 2009; 29(6): 470 - 475. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Petersen, A. Anderson, S. Allan, and C. Wilkinson Opening the black box: scientists' views on the role of the news media in the nanotechnology debate Public Understanding of Science, September 1, 2009; 18(5): 512 - 530. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Valerie Burri Coping with uncertainty: Assessing nanotechnologies in a citizen panel in Switzerland Public Understanding of Science, September 1, 2009; 18(5): 498 - 511. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Kurath and P. Gisler Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio- and nanotechnology Public Understanding of Science, September 1, 2009; 18(5): 559 - 573. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Landau, C. R. Groscurth, L. Wright, and C. M. Condit Visualizing nanotechnology: the impact of visual images on lay American audience associations with nanotechnology Public Understanding of Science, May 1, 2009; 18(3): 325 - 337. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Schutz and P. M. Wiedemann Framing effects on risk perception of nanotechnology Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2008; 17(3): 369 - 379. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. F. E. Ebeling Mediating Uncertainty: Communicating the Financial Risks of Nanotechnologies Science Communication, March 1, 2008; 29(3): 335 - 361. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. Bowman, G. A. Hodge, and P. Binks Are We Really the Prey? Nanotechnology as Science and Science Fiction Bulletin of Science Technology Society, December 1, 2007; 27(6): 435 - 445. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. F. Stephens News Narratives about Nano S&T in Major U.S. and Non-U.S. Newspapers Science Communication, December 1, 2005; 27(2): 175 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Anderson, S. Allan, A. Petersen, and C. Wilkinson The Framing of Nanotechnologies in the British Newspaper Press Science Communication, December 1, 2005; 27(2): 200 - 220. [Abstract] [PDF]