This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Schummer, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Reading nano: the public interest in nanotechnology as reflected in purchase patterns of books

Department of Philosophy, University of Darmstadt, Schloss, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany, Department of Philosophy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29205, USA, js{at}hyle.org

Owing to a rapidly growing public interest in nanotechnology, people are increasingly buying various books to inform themselves about nanotechnology. This paper tries to measure the public interest in nanotechnology and its relation to the public interest in other fields of knowledge by applying a new method. I combine formal network analysis of co-purchase book data with traditional content analysis. The method is successful in identifying the books that the public reads to be informed about nanotechnology, and in distinguishing between different kinds and classes of books and thereby between different interest foci and readerships and their relations. The results suggest that nanotechnology is for many their first intense contact with science and technology and that they read a great variety of different kinds of books. Rather than choose general introductions to current research written by scientists or science journalists, readers focus on forecasting and visionary literature including business guides, written by software entrepreneurs and business consultants. Unlike expert readers, who connect nanotechnology to other fields of science and engineering, the broader public connects it to visions about dissolving the human/machine distinction. Although the distinction between non-fiction and science fiction is still important for readers, border-crossing authors increasingly blur it.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 14, No. 2, 163-183 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0963662505050111


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Landau, C. R. Groscurth, L. Wright, and C. M. Condit Visualizing nanotechnology: the impact of visual images on lay American audience associations with nanotechnology Public Understanding of Science, May 1, 2009; 18(3): 325 - 337. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. W. Berne and J. Schummer Teaching Societal and Ethical Implications of Nanotechnology to Engineering Students Through Science Fiction Bulletin of Science Technology Society, December 1, 2005; 25(6): 459 - 468. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. F. Stephens News Narratives about Nano S&T in Major U.S. and Non-U.S. Newspapers Science Communication, December 1, 2005; 27(2): 175 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]