This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wright, N. Articles by Nerlich, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Use of the deficit model in a shared culture of argumentation: the case of foot and mouth science

University of British Columbia, Canada, npwright{at}interchange.ubc.ca

Brigitte Nerlich

University of Nottingham, UK, Brigitte.Nerlich{at}nottingham.ac.uk

The "deficit model" as an explanation of the public understanding of science has attracted sustained criticism. While acknowledging the limitations of the deficit model, we argue that researchers should not abandon all interest in exploring it. Our results suggest that the deficit model is an important part of a culture of argumentation shared by both scientists and members of the public, and drawn upon as explanations of the public understanding of science. We carried out discourse analysis of a focus group conducted at the height of the UK's Foot and Mouth Disease crisis. The focus of our analysis was a debate about the science behind the spread and control of the virus. The results point to the importance of the deficit model in the public understanding ofthe public understanding of science. The challenge is to look to other ways of describing the relation between science and society, while recognizing that the deficit model serves scientists, the public and others alike as a resource for political discourse.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 15, No. 3, 331-342 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0963662506063017


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Michael Publics performing publics: of PiGs, PiPs and politics Public Understanding of Science, September 1, 2009; 18(5): 617 - 631. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Prainsack and M. Kitzberger DNA behind bars: other ways of knowing forensic DNA technologies. Social Studies of Science, February 1, 2009; 39(1): 51 - 79. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Hamilton, S. Adolphs, and B. Nerlich The meanings of 'risk': a view from corpus linguistics Discourse Society, March 1, 2007; 18(2): 163 - 181. [Abstract] [PDF]