This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Young, N. Articles by Matthews, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Experts’ understanding of the public: knowledge control in a risk controversy

University of Ottawa, Canada, nyoung{at}uottawa.ca

Ralph Matthews

Department of Anthropology and Sociology, University of British Columbia, Canada, ralph.matthews{at}ubc.ca

This paper reverses the common emphasis in the literature on public understanding of science by examining "experts’ understanding of the public." This research uses the case of aquaculture in Canada, a highly contested mode of production that has divided the scientific community and public opinion. Using a survey of 300 aquaculture experts in Canada, we examine three dimensions of experts’ understanding of public "contributions" to this controversy. These are (1) stakeholder participation in aquaculture regulation and policy, (2) the media as an interpreter and communicator of expert claims, and (3) the knowledge and values basis of general public opinion. We find that experts’ views on lay knowledge and participation in the debate swing from strongly positive to strongly negative. Using quantitative and qualitative data from the survey, we argue that these swings in experts’ views of the public coincide with issues of control over knowledge. Experts on all sides of the aquaculture controversy are markedly open to incorporating lay knowledge into scientific practices (a situation where expert control over knowledge is retained), but are highly critical of lay "consumption" of expert claims (a situation where expert control over knowledge is lost).

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 16, No. 2, 123-144 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0963662507060586


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J.W. Bos, C. M. Koolstra, and J. T.J.M. Willems Adolescent responses toward a new technology: first associations, information seeking and affective responses to ecogenomics Public Understanding of Science, March 1, 2009; 18(2): 243 - 253. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. R. Davies Constructing Communication: Talking to Scientists About Talking to the Public Science Communication, June 1, 2008; 29(4): 413 - 434. [Abstract] [PDF]