This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nisbet, M. C. Articles by Goidel, R. K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: bridging the ethnographic—survey research divide

School of Communication, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20016, USA, nisbetmc{at}gmail.com

Robert K. Goidel

Manship School of Mass Communication at Louisiana State University

Using the contemporary debate in the United States over embryonic stem cell research as a test case, we outline a theoretical framework that points to the central impact of value predispositions, schema, political knowledge, and forms of mass media use in shaping public perceptions of science. In the process, by proposing an alternative approach to the dominant science literacy model, we address the existing divide between survey-based and ethnographic studies. Analyzing nationally representative survey data collected in the US in the fall of 2003, our findings suggest that value predispositions related to Christian conservatism and social ideology, along with schema related to abortion and reservations about science, serve as primary influences on citizen evaluations of embryonic stem cell research and therapeutic cloning, while our measure of issue-specific political knowledge had no statistically significant impact. In addition, after all controls, attention to newspaper coverage along with various forms of genre-specific entertainment television use have unique influences on citizen evaluations, suggesting that the mass media provide an important part of the social context by which citizens judge controversial science. Other survey results since our data collection in 2003 lend support to our findings. Religious and ideological values appear to filter the influence of information disseminated by scientific institutions. We conclude by discussing future research that connects findings from ethnographic studies with survey-based approaches.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 16, No. 4, 421-440 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0963662506065558


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Liu and S. Priest Understanding public support for stem cell research: media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors Public Understanding of Science, November 1, 2009; 18(6): 704 - 718. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Hwang and B. G. Southwell Science TV News Exposure Predicts Science Beliefs: Real World Effects Among a National Sample Communication Research, October 1, 2009; 36(5): 724 - 742. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. C. Nisbet and D. A. Scheufele What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2009; 96(10): 1767 - 1778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. O. Stewart, D. L. Dickerson, and R. Hotchkiss Beliefs About Science and News Frames in Audience Evaluations of Embryonic and Adult Stem Cell Research Science Communication, June 1, 2009; 30(4): 427 - 452. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V.L. Peddie, M. Porter, C. Counsell, L. Caie, D. Pearson, and S. Bhattacharya 'Not taken in by media hype': how potential donors, recipients and members of the general public perceive stem cell research Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1106 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]