This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Falk, J. H. Articles by Dierking, L. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Investigating public science interest and understanding: evidence for the importance of free-choice learning

Institute for Learning Innovation, 166 West Street, Annapolis, MD 21403, USA, falk{at}ilinet.org

Martin Storksdieck

Institute for Learning Innovation

Lynn D. Dierking

Institute for Learning Innovation

Historically, most of the focus of science education has been on pre-college and college level schooling. Although some of the public's interest and knowledge about science is unquestionably shaped by compulsory schooling, given that the average adult spends only a fraction of their life participating in some kind of formal schooling, we argue that the contribution of school-based science learning to the long-term public understanding of science is limited, particularly for the majority of Americans who do not go on to post-secondary schooling. This article shows that the majority of the public constructs much of its understanding of science over the course of their lives, gathering information from many places and contexts, and for a diversity of reasons. A random telephone survey of Los Angeles, California residents found that nearly half (43 percent) of the public's self-reported science understanding derives from leisure time, free-choice learning; science understanding was primarily acquired for reasons related to personal interest, need and/or curiosity. The conclusion drawn from this preliminary investigation is that future efforts to understand and support the public's understanding of science will require approaches that take into account individual differences and the unique personal and context-specific nature of knowledge; findings also support the value of asset-based approaches to education which build from strengths rather than dwelling upon deficits.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 16, No. 4, 455-469 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0963662506064240


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Kahlor and S. Rosenthal If We Seek, Do We Learn?: Predicting Knowledge of Global Warming Science Communication, March 1, 2009; 30(3): 380 - 414. [Abstract] [PDF]