This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wilson, K. Articles by Boon, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Parental views on pediatric vaccination: the impact of competing advocacy coalitions

14EN-220, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C4, Kumanan.Wilson{at}uhn.on.ca

Meredith Barakat

McGill University, Montreal, Canada, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Sunita Vohra

Complementary and Alternative Research and Education (CARE) program, Edmonton, Alberta

Paul Ritvo

Division of Preventive Oncology at Cancer Care Ontario, School of Kinesiology and Health Sciences at York University and in the Department of Public Health Sciences at the University of Toronto

Heather Boon

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Investigator

The debate on pediatric vaccination policy has been characterized by the presence of two distinct coalitions: those in favor of current vaccination policies and those expressing concern about these policies. The target of these coalitions is the vaccination decision of parents. To determine their influence, we conducted four focus groups in Toronto, Canada examining parental decision-making concerning pediatric vaccination. Our focus groups consisted of both fathers and mothers and parents who fully vaccinated and those who did not. Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework as an analytic guide, we identified several themes that provided insights into how effective the two coalitions have been in conveying their viewpoints. In general, we identified a variety of levels of belief systems existing amongst parents concerned about vaccination, some more amenable to change than others. We found that the choice to not vaccinate was largely a result of concerns about safety and, to a lesser extent, about lack of effectiveness. These parental views reflected the ability of the coalition concerned about vaccination to challenge parents' trust in traditional public health sources of information. In contrast, the parental decision to vaccinate was due to recognizing the importance of preventing disease and also a consequence of not questioning recommendations from public health and physicians and feeling pressured to because of school policies. Importantly, parents who fully vaccinate appear to have weaker belief systems that are potentially susceptible to change. While current policies appear to be effective in encouraging vaccination, if trust in public health falters, many who currently support vaccination may reevaluate their position. More research needs to be conducted to identify approaches to communicate the risks and benefits of vaccination to parents.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 17, No. 2, 231-243 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0963662506067662


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?