This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0963662506070162v1 17/3/309    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Critchley, C. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Public opinion and trust in scientists: the role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers

Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University, P.O. Box 214, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia, ccritchley{at}swin.edu.au

This research examined why the public may be less supportive of stem cell research when conducted in a private compared to public research context. A representative sample ( n = 403) of Australians who were exposed to information relating to privately funded scientists were significantly less likely to approve of stem cell research than those who were presented with a scenario of scientists working within a publicly funded University (n = 401) and a control condition (n = 404). Mediation analyses revealed that the decrease in approval was primarily associated with the tendency of privately funded scientists to be trusted less than their publicly funded counterparts. Public trust in University scientists was also found to be higher than that of private scientists because publicly funded scientists were perceived to be motivated more by benevolence, and more likely to produce benefits that will be accessible to the public. While private scientists were perceived to be more self interested than public scientists, perceived self interest did not explain the decrease in trust. There were also no significant differences across research contexts for the perceived competence of scientists or the likelihood that stem cell research would result in cures for diseases. The implications of these results are discussed in relation to the possible decrease in public trust that may occur alongside the increasing privatization of academic enquiry, and particularly controversial scientific research.

Key Words: stem cell research • trust • lay theories of human motivation.

This version was published on July 1, 2008

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 17, No. 3, 309-327 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0963662506070162


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Jurberg, M. Verjovsky, G. d. O. Cardoso Machado, and O. R. Affonso-Mitidieri Embryonic stem cell: A climax in the reign of the Brazilian media Public Understanding of Science, November 1, 2009; 18(6): 719 - 729. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V.L. Peddie, M. Porter, C. Counsell, L. Caie, D. Pearson, and S. Bhattacharya 'Not taken in by media hype': how potential donors, recipients and members of the general public perceive stem cell research Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1106 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]