Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Understanding of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0963662507083529v1
18/4/464    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, K. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In quest of publicity: the science—media partnership of the Galathea Deep Sea Expedition from 1950 to 1952

Kristian Hvidtfelt Nielsen

Department of Science Studies, University of Aarhus, C.F. Møllers Allé, Building 1110, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark, khn{at}ivs.au.dk

The Galathea Deep Sea Expedition from 1950 to 1952 combined oceanographic research with simultaneous science reporting and strategically seeking publicity. In effect, the expedition organizers ventured into a science—media partnership. From the beginning, reporting scientific exploration to the general public at home and abroad was considered an essential part of the expedition. Combining scientific objectives with publicity concerns, the expedition built on boundary work performed by boundary workers separating science from the media. Several boundary objects were mobilized to facilitate interactions across the cultural border between scientists and journalists. In particular, the mythological sea serpent domesticated by scientists and fully adopted by journalists played an important role in aligning the scientific aspects of the expedition with publicity and science reporting. The historical narrative of the expedition feeds into contemporary discussions about the dominant discourse on science and the media.

This version was published on July 1, 2009

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 18, No. 4, 464-480 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0963662507083529


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?