This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0963662508098581v1 18/5/617    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Michael, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Publics performing publics: of PiGs, PiPs and politics

Department of Sociology, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK, M.Michael{at}gold.ac.uk

This theoretical paper considers the ways in which the "publics" of public understanding of science and public engagement with science perform themselves not only in relation to science knowledge and scientific institutions, but also in relation to other publics. Specifically, through a survey of the literature, there is an exploration of the processes of differentiation and identification amongst publics. Two broad rhetorical categories of public are identified: Publics-in-General (PiGs) and Publics-in-Particular (PiPs). The means by which they are variously differentiated, and the performative uses to which these can be put are considered. Implications for both the implementation of public engagement processes, and the critique of such engagement, are discussed.

Key Words: engagement • politics • public-in-general • public-in-particular

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 18, No. 5, 617-631 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0963662508098581


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?