This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bauer, M. Articles by Schoon, I. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Mapping variety in public understanding of science

University of Berne and the London School of Economics, Science Museum, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2DD, UK

Ingrid Schoon

We analyse around 15 000 responses from 11 countries to the open survey question `please tell me in your own words, what does it mean to study something scientifically' in order to show cultural diversity in public representations of science. In past studies this question has been coded on a five-point rating scale that is used to rank scientific literacy across different countries. We develop, apply and evaluate an alternative coding frame. We show that our coding is more adequate, more reliable and produces less noise than the frame used by others to analyse responses to the same question. Multiple coding on five dimensions allows us to characterize people's understanding of science in terms of methods, institutions, effects, examples and level of differentiation of the response. We use correspondence analysis to characterize distinct response patterns in ten European countries and the USA. The data shows that no simple cultural division such as Protestant versus Catholic, or north-south divide, or Latin versus Anglo-Saxon fits the variance in the data. The paper closes with an agenda for future research in the area of public understanding of science and technology.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 2, No. 2, 141-155 (1993)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/2/2/004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Valerie Burri Coping with uncertainty: Assessing nanotechnologies in a citizen panel in Switzerland Public Understanding of Science, September 1, 2009; 18(5): 498 - 511. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. W. Bauer, N. Allum, and S. Miller What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2007; 16(1): 79 - 95. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Christidou, K. Dimopoulos, and V. Koulaidis Constructing social representations of science and technology: the role of metaphors in the press and the popular scientific magazines Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2004; 13(4): 347 - 362. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Dimopoulos and V. Koulaidis The socio-epistemic constitution of science and technology in the Greek press: an analysis of its presentation Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2002; 11(3): 225 - 241. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. CLARK and D. L. ILLMAN Dimensions of Civic Science: Introductory Essay Science Communication, September 1, 2001; 23(1): 5 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. L. Lujan and O. Todt Perceptions, attitudes and ethical valuations: the ambivalence of the public image of biotechnology in Spain Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2000; 9(4): 383 - 392. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. W. Bauer, K. Petkova, and P. Boyadjieva Public Knowledge of and Attitudes to Science: Alternative Measures That May End the "Science War" Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 2000; 25(1): 30 - 51. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Bauer The medicalization of science news - from the "rocket-scalpel" to the "gene-meteorite" complex Social Science Information, December 1, 1998; 37(4): 731 - 751. [Abstract]

				J. D. Miller The measurement of civic scientific literacy Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 1998; 7(3): 203 - 223. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Bauer Socio-demographic correlates of DK-responses in knowledge surveys: self-attributed ignorance of science Social Science Information, March 1, 1996; 35(1): 39 - 68. [Abstract]

				G. Evans and J. Durant The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 1995; 4(1): 57 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D. Miller Theory and measurement in the public understanding of science: a rejoinder to Bauer and Schoon Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 1993; 2(3): 235 - 243. [Abstract] [PDF]