Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Understanding of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neidhardt, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The public as a communication system

Friedhelm Neidhardt

Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Reichpietschufer 50, D-10785 Berlin, Germany

The public can be considered as a communication field with three main actors: speakers, communicators, and the audience. The characteristics of these actors and the features of their interaction constitute the social infrastructure of public knowledge production. There is both theoretical reason and practical evidence to suggest that the mass media tend to construct science stories in terms of spectacular events, simple causes and unambiguous moral positions. These tendencies create some elementary problems where `science meets the public'. By `popularization' the distance between the communication systems of science and of the public can be reduced but not eliminated.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 2, No. 4, 339-350 (1993)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/2/4/004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
J. Kim
Public feeling for science: The Hwang affair and Hwang supporters
Public Understanding of Science, November 1, 2009; 18(6): 670 - 686.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
P. Weingart, C. Salzmann, and S. Wormann
The social embedding of biomedicine: an analysis of German media debates 1995--2004
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2008; 17(3): 381 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
M. W. Bauer, K. Petkova, P. Boyadjieva, and G. Gornev
Long-Term Trends in the Public Representation of Science Across the 'Iron Curtain': 1946-1995
Social Studies of Science, February 1, 2006; 36(1): 99 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
V. Christidou, K. Dimopoulos, and V. Koulaidis
Constructing social representations of science and technology: the role of metaphors in the press and the popular scientific magazines
Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2004; 13(4): 347 - 362.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
M. W. Bauer
Arenas, Platforms, and the Biotechnology Movement
Science Communication, December 1, 2002; 24(2): 144 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
K. Dimopoulos and V. Koulaidis
The socio-epistemic constitution of science and technology in the Greek press: an analysis of its presentation
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2002; 11(3): 225 - 241.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. W. Bauer
Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology: a cultivation analysis
Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2002; 11(2): 93 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
F. CLARK and D. L. ILLMAN
Dimensions of Civic Science: Introductory Essay
Science Communication, September 1, 2001; 23(1): 5 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]