This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Frewer, L. J. Articles by Shepherd, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Attributing information to different sources: effects on the perceived qualities of information, on the perceived relevance of information, and on attitude formation

Richard Shepherd

What is salient in risk communication, and what is believed, is likely to be related to factors additional to the informational content itself. The social context or derivation of the information are important determinants of receiver reactions, particularly where the potential hazard is characterized as unknown, or where the knowledge base surrounding the potential hazard is perceived to be at the level of society rather than of individual members of the general public (for example, genetic engineering). Experimental data are presented which examine the effect of information source on perceptions of qualities of the information (particularly trust in what is being communicated) and subsequent attitudes towards genetic engineering within the context of food safety. It was found that selfreported trust in hypothetical situations may not equate with behavioural responses to actual information when attributed to a particular source. Source attribution as opposed to anonymity was the most important determinant of perceived informational quality. Public reaction to risk information is likely to be determined by a complex inter-relationship between source and hazard characteristics.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 3, No. 4, 385-401 (1994)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/3/4/003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Qin and J. L. Brown Public reactions to information about genetically engineered foods: effects of information formats and male/female differences Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2007; 16(4): 471 - 488. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. R. Bates Public culture and public understanding of genetics: a focus group study Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2005; 14(1): 47 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Rowe, L. Frewer, and L. Sjoberg Newspaper reporting of hazards in the UK and Sweden Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2000; 9(1): 59 - 78. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. J. Frewer, C. Howard, and R. Shepherd Public Concerns in the United Kingdom about General and Specific Applications of Genetic Engineering: Risk, Benefit, and Ethics Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 1997; 22(1): 98 - 124. [Abstract] [PDF]