This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Eden, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions

Environmental policy depends for its success on public participation. However, the scientific construction of environmental issues often means that such participation in policy-making is difficult when the public is not considered scientifically `expert'. Even if the notion of `expertise' is broadened to deal with this problem, this does not ensure truly `public'—i.e. lay—involvement, because lay ideas are still not included but are discounted as `non-scientific'. Further, emphasis on the scientific and environmental education of the general public will not guarantee policy implementation by individuals. Therefore, if we wish to design environmental policy that can be successfully implemented, we must consider other ways in which people relate to their environments as well as through scientific mediation—ways in which people `understand' their environments through culture, morality and social interaction—and build these into environmental policy.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 5, No. 3, 183-204 (1996)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/5/3/001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Lorenzoni and M. Hulme Believing is seeing: laypeople's views of future socio-economic and climate change in England and in Italy Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2009; 18(4): 383 - 400. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Harvey Drama, Talk, and Emotion: Omitted Aspects of Public Participation Science Technology Human Values, March 1, 2009; 34(2): 139 - 161. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Zimmerman and K. Cuddington Ambiguous, circular and polysemous: students' definitions of the "balance of nature" metaphor Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2007; 16(4): 393 - 406. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. B. Graham and N. Lindeman The Rhetoric and Politics of Science in the Case of the Missouri River System Journal of Business and Technical Communication, October 1, 2005; 19(4): 422 - 448. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. V. Lewenstein Editorial: A decade of Public Understanding Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2002; 11(1): 1 - 4. [PDF]

				F. CLARK and D. L. ILLMAN Dimensions of Civic Science: Introductory Essay Science Communication, September 1, 2001; 23(1): 5 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Lane Public understanding of the environmental impact of road transport Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2000; 9(2): 165 - 174. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Eden Environmental issues: knowledge, uncertainty and the environment Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 1998; 22(3): 425 - 432. [PDF]