Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Understanding of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, G.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Scientists and the public understanding of science

Gillian Pearson

The Oxford Trust Oxford Centre for Innovation, Mill Street, Oxford OX2 0JX, UK

Susan M. Pringle

Department for Continuing Education at the University of Bristol, 8-10 Berkeley Square, Clifton, Bristol BS8 1HH, UK

Jeffery N. Thomas

Centre for Science Education at the Open University, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire MK7 6AA, UK

This paper discusses the attitudes and opinions of research scientists and engineers to taking part in public understanding of science activities. A survey was carried out at an event in set95 (the UK's 1995 National Week of Science, Engineering and Technology), which involved 168 scientists from the University of Bristol, UK, taking their research work into a shopping mall in Bristol for two days. All participating scientists and engineers were asked to complete a written questionnaire shortly after the event and then at least one participant from each display was contacted seven months later for telephone interview. The results show that while most of the scientists took part because they were told to by senior colleagues, after the event almost all (94 per cent) wanted to take part again mainly because they had found the experience enjoyable. Despite the demands of time and organization, individuals benefited from taking part; participants felt it improved their presentation skills and enhanced morale. They regarded the exhibition as good for communication skills training and did not want formal training for the event. The exhibition was also valued as a team-building exercise both within individual departments and across the University.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 6, No. 3, 279-289 (1997)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/6/3/006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. J. Martin-Sempere, B. Garzon-Garcia, and J. Rey-Rocha
Scientists' motivation to communicate science and technology to the public: surveying participants at the Madrid Science Fair
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2008; 17(3): 349 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
S. R. Davies
Constructing Communication: Talking to Scientists About Talking to the Public
Science Communication, June 1, 2008; 29(4): 413 - 434.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
E. Poliakoff and T. L. Webb
What Factors Predict Scientists' Intentions to Participate in Public Engagement of Science Activities?
Science Communication, December 1, 2007; 29(2): 242 - 263.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
F. CLARK and D. L. ILLMAN
Dimensions of Civic Science: Introductory Essay
Science Communication, September 1, 2001; 23(1): 5 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
A. Kajanne and A.-M. Pirttila-Backman
Laypeople's viewpoints about the reasons for expert controversy regarding food additives
Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 1999; 8(4): 303 - 315.
[Abstract] [PDF]