Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Understanding of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kerr, A.
Right arrow Articles by Amos, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The new genetics and health: mobilizing lay expertise

Anne Kerr

Science Studies Unit, University of Edinburgh

Sarah Cunningham-Burley

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh

Amanda Amos

Public understanding of the new genetics is often criticized in discussions about the social and ethical issues the new genetics raise. In this paper we challenge the "deficit model" evident in this dominant discourse, and offer a constructivist approach. We explore lay expertise about the new genetics, presenting an analysis of data from ten focus group discussions with a range of lay people. After distinguishing four different types of knowledge lay people hold—technical, methodological, institutional, and cultural—we go on to consider how lay people's mobilization of this "stock of knowledge" is influenced by social location and social context, exploring in particular interviewees' perceptions of relevancy. We conclude that identifying lay people as expert in, rather than ignorant of, the way genetics may shape their lives is a fundamental first step in moving toward greater lay participation in policy discussions and, ultimately, decision making about the new genetics and health.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 7, No. 1, 41-60 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/096366259800700104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
S. Davies, E. McCallie, E. Simonsson, J. L. Lehr, and S. Duensing
Discussing dialogue: perspectives on the value of science dialogue events that do not inform policy
Public Understanding of Science, May 1, 2009; 18(3): 338 - 353.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
K. Weiner
Lay Involvement and Legitimacy: The Construction of Expertise and Participation within HEART UK
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, April 1, 2009; 38(2): 254 - 273.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
L. Kahlor and S. Rosenthal
If We Seek, Do We Learn?: Predicting Knowledge of Global Warming
Science Communication, March 1, 2009; 30(3): 380 - 414.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
N. Hudson, L. Culley, F. Rapport, M. Johnson, and A. Bharadwaj
"Public" perceptions of gamete donation: a research review
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2009; 18(1): 61 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
R. Evans and A. Plows
Listening Without Prejudice?: Re-discovering the Value of the Disinterested Citizen
Social Studies of Science, December 1, 2007; 37(6): 827 - 853.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
J. Burgess, A. Stirling, J. Clark, G. Davies, M. Eames, K. Staley, and S. Williamson
Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2007; 16(3): 299 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
A. Kerr, S. Cunningham-Burley, and R. Tutton
Shifting Subject Positions: Experts and Lay People in Public Dialogue
Social Studies of Science, June 1, 2007; 37(3): 385 - 411.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
A. Tupasela
Re-examining medical modernization: framing the public in Finnish biomedical research policy.
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2007; 16(1): 63 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. Lock, J. Freeman, R. Sharples, and S. Lloyd
When it runs in the family: putting susceptibility genes in perspective
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2006; 15(3): 277 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
S. McClean and A. Shaw
From Schism to Continuum? The Problematic Relationship Between Expert and Lay Knowledge--An Exploratory Conceptual Synthesis of Two Qualitative Studies
Qual Health Res, July 1, 2005; 15(6): 729 - 749.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
S. E. Gollust, K. Apse, B. P. Fuller, P. S. Miller, and B. B. Biesecker
Community Involvement in Developing Policies for Genetic Testing: Assessing the Interests and Experiences of Individuals Affected by Genetic Conditions
Am J Public Health, January 1, 2005; 95(1): 35 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
B. R. Bates
Public culture and public understanding of genetics: a focus group study
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2005; 14(1): 47 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. Levitt, K. Weiner, and J. Goodacre
Gene Week: a novel way of consulting the public
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2005; 14(1): 67 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
J. L Halliday, V. R Collins, M. A. Aitken, M. P M Richards, and C. A Olsson
Genetics and public health--evolution, or revolution?
J Epidemiol Community Health, November 1, 2004; 58(11): 894 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
A. Kerr
Rights and Responsibilities in the New Genetics Era
Critical Social Policy, May 1, 2003; 23(2): 208 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
C. Emslie, K. Hunt, and G. Watt
A chip off the old block? Lay understandings of inheritance among men and women in mid-life
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2003; 12(1): 47 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
A. Shaw
"It just goes against the grain." Public understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in the UK
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2002; 11(3): 273 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health (London)Home page
S. Franklin
Culturing Biology: Cell Lines for the Second Millennium
Health (London) , July 1, 2001; 5(3): 335 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
I. Barns, R. Schibeci, A. Davison, and R. Shaw
"What Do You Think about Genetic Medicine?" Facilitating Sociable Public Discourse on Developments in the New Genetics
Science Technology Human Values, July 1, 2000; 25(3): 283 - 308.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
A. Kerr and S. Cunningham-Burley
On Ambivalence and Risk: Reflexive Modernity and the New Human Genetics
Sociology, May 1, 2000; 34(2): 283 - 304.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Communication InquiryHome page
A. Petersen
The Portrayal of Research into Genetic-Based Differences of Sex and Sexual Orientation: A Study of "Popular" Science Journals, 1980 to 1997
Journal of Communication Inquiry, April 1, 1999; 23(2): 163 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
A. Kerr, S. Cunningham-Burley, and A. Amos
Drawing the line: an analysis of lay people's discussions about the new genetics
Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 1998; 7(2): 113 - 133.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
A. Kerr, S. Cunningham-Burley, and A. Amos
Eugenics and the New Genetics in Britain: Examining Contemporary Professionals' Accounts
Science Technology Human Values, April 1, 1998; 23(2): 175 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]