This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (40) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Condit, C. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

How the public understands genetics: non-deterministic and non-discriminatory interpretations of the "blueprint" metaphor

University of Georgia, Athens

Critics have worried that recent mass media coverage of genetics encourages genetic determinism and discriminatory attitudes in the public. They have identified the "blueprint" metaphor as one major component of public discourse that encourages such undesirable public opinions. To assess public interpretations of popular discourse about genetics, this audience study exposed 137 college students to sample genetics news articles and asked for their interpretations of the "blueprint" metaphor and of genetics in general. A larger group, the plurality, offered non-deterministic interpretations and perspectives on genetics. A small minority offered discriminatory interpretations, whereas a plurality offered explicit antidiscriminatory interpretations and opinions. Non-deterministic views were based on interpretations of the blueprint metaphor that understood genes as operating in a partial and probabilistic fashion, and that interpreted genes as malleable through individual will or technological intervention.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 8, No. 3, 169-180 (1999)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/8/3/302


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Prior Talking About the Gene for Cancer: A Study of Lay and Professional Knowledge of Cancer Genetics Sociology, December 1, 2007; 41(6): 985 - 1001. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. J. Lopez Notes on Metaphors, Notes as Metaphors: The Genome as Musical Spectacle Science Communication, September 1, 2007; 29(1): 7 - 34. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Lock, J. Freeman, R. Sharples, and S. Lloyd When it runs in the family: putting susceptibility genes in perspective Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2006; 15(3): 277 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Giarelli Images of Cloning and Stem Cell Research in Editorial Cartoons in the United States Qual Health Res, January 1, 2006; 16(1): 61 - 78. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Miah Genetics, cyberspace and bioethics: why not a public engagement with ethics? Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2005; 14(4): 409 - 421. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. R. Bates Public culture and public understanding of genetics: a focus group study Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2005; 14(1): 47 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Ceccarelli Neither Confusing Cacophony Nor Culinary Complements: A Case Study of Mixed Metaphors for Genomic Science Written Communication, January 1, 2004; 21(1): 92 - 105. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M. Hedgecoe Terminology and the Construction of Scientific Disciplines: The Case of Pharmacogenomics Science Technology Human Values, October 1, 2003; 28(4): 513 - 537. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Benner Creating a More Responsible Public Dialogue About the Social, Ethical, and Legal Aspects of Genomics Am. J. Crit. Care., May 1, 2003; 12(3): 259 - 261. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. CONDIT, A. FERGUSON, R. KASSEL, C. THADHANI, H. C. GOODING, and R. PARROTT An Exploratory Study of the Impact of News Headlines on Genetic Determinism Science Communication, June 1, 2001; 22(4): 379 - 395. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M. Hedgecoe The popularization of genetics as geneticization Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2000; 9(2): 183 - 189. [PDF]