Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Understanding of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Juengst, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Genetic testing and the moral dynamics of family life

Eric T. Juengst

Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine in Cleveland, Ohio

American families are a segment of the public that will feel the impact of the Human Genome Project most acutely: but they are also one of the least well studied segments with regard to that impact. Three sets of ethical problems, in particular, deserve more scrutiny: the effect of increased genetic risk assessment on family members' willingness to assist their kin discover mutually incriminating genetic risks, its impact on the candor with which extended families communicate within themselves about their genetic health risks, and its influence on the ways that families seek to protect the interests of their most vulnerable members. In each of these areas, anecdotal experience already shows how genetic testing can undermine a family's commitment to its own interdependence in these ways, and that traditional, multigenerational, sessile families are likely to experience more disruption than either blended families or "virtual families" linked primarily through electronic communication.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 8, No. 3, 193-205 (1999)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/8/3/304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
E. T. Juengst
FACE Facts: Why Human Genetics Will Always Provoke Bioethics
J. Law Med. Ethics, June 1, 2004; 32(2): 267 - 275.
[PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
C. Foster, M. Watson, C. Moynihan, A. Ardern-jones, and R. Eeles
Genetic Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Predisposition: Cancer Burden and Responsibility
J Health Psychol, July 1, 2002; 7(4): 469 - 484.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
E. Chapman and J. A. Smith
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and the New Genetics
J Health Psychol, March 1, 2002; 7(2): 125 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]