Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Understanding of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The use of genetic information and public accountability

Burke K. Zimmerman

Board, Spectrum Medical Sciences, Ltd, based in Helsinki, Finland

With the explosion in new technologies that heralded the end of the 20th century, enabling the rapid gathering and analysis of genetic information from humans and the multitude of other organisms with which they interact on this planet, we are now in a position not only to understand the details of everyone's genetically determined features, but to manipulate them to our own design. The implications of the power of such knowledge are indeed profound, demanding that the developers and users of the technology spawned by this revolution apply it according to the terms of a new social contract to be negotiated with the public at large. The means by which industries and medical practitioners educate the public consumers, and the mechanisms by which the public, through the institutions of democratic government and other modes of communication, makes its concerns and desires a functional part of the equation, are being determined. To establish processes for both, with the flexibility to accommodate individual and collective values that are highly time-dependent, is a major challenge of the 21st century. Applications of genetic data are examined with respect to professional responsibility, the possibility of deliberate misuse, the principle of autonomy, and distributive justice.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 8, No. 3, 223-240 (1999)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/8/3/307


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
B. R. Bates
Public culture and public understanding of genetics: a focus group study
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2005; 14(1): 47 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]