This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Conrad, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Uses of expertise: sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news

Department of Sociology, MS-071, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, Conrad{at}brandeis.edu

Science journalists call upon experts for background and for clarification and comment on scientific findings. This paper examines how science writers choose and use experts, and it focuses on several cases of reporting about genetics and behavior. Our research included two sources of data: interviews with 15 science reporters and three print media samples of coverage of genetics and behavior—alcoholism (between 1980-1995), homosexuality (in 1993 and 1995), and mental illness (between 1970-1995). Science reporters seek relevant and specific experts for nearly every story. Good sources are knowledgeable, are connected to prestigious institutions, are direct and articulate and don't overqualify statements, and they return phone calls. The mean number of experts quoted was 2.8 per story, differing for alcoholism (3.5), homosexuality (2.8), and mental illness (2.6). Researchers and scientists predominated among experts quoted. Quotes were used to provide context, give legitimization, as explication, to provide a kind of balance, and to outline implications. For the homosexuality sample, a significantly greater percentage of activists and advocates were quoted (21 percent compared with 5 percent and 1 percent in other samples, X² < 0.0001). "Lay" quotes for alcoholism and mental illness were minimal. Except for homosexuality, whose advocates are organized, those "affected" do not have a voice in genetics news stories.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 8, No. 4, 285-302 (1999)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/8/4/302


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Alcibar Human Cloning and the Raelians: Media Coverage and the Rhetoric of Science Science Communication, December 1, 2008; 30(2): 236 - 265. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. L. Nucci and R. Kubey "We Begin Tonight With Fruits and Vegetables": Genetically Modified Food on the Evening News 1980-2003 Science Communication, December 1, 2007; 29(2): 147 - 176. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. Barr and R. McConkey A different type of appointment: the experiences of parents who have children with intellectual disabilities referred for genetic investigation Journal of Research in Nursing, November 1, 2007; 12(6): 637 - 652. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Michelle `Human clones talk about their lives': media representations of assisted reproductive and biogenetic technologies Media Culture Society, July 1, 2007; 29(4): 639 - 663. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Marks, N. Kalaitzandonakes, L. Wilkins, and L. Zakharova Mass media framing of biotechnology news Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 183 - 203. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Petersen The genetic conception of health: is it as radical as claimed? Health (London) , October 1, 2006; 10(4): 481 - 500. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. R. Bates Public culture and public understanding of genetics: a focus group study Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2005; 14(1): 47 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Valiverronen Stories of the "medicine cow": representations of future promises in media discourse Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2004; 13(4): 363 - 377. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Sankar, M. K. Cho, C. M. Condit, L. M. Hunt, B. Koenig, P. Marshall, S. S.-J. Lee, and P. Spicer Genetic Research and Health Disparities JAMA, June 23, 2004; 291(24): 2985 - 2989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Holliman Media Coverage of Cloning: A Study of Media Content, Production and Reception Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2004; 13(2): 107 - 130. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Mountcastle-Shah, E. Tambor, B. A. Bernhardt, G. Geller, R. Karaliukas, J. E. Rodgers, and N. A. Holtzman Assessing Mass Media Reporting of Disease-Related Genetic Discoveries: Development of an Instrument and Initial Findings Science Communication, June 1, 2003; 24(4): 458 - 478. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Dumlao and S. Duke The Web and E-Mail in Science Communication Science Communication, March 1, 2003; 24(3): 283 - 308. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Conrad and S. Markens Constructing the 'Gay Gene' in the News: Optimism and Skepticism in the US and British Press Health (London) , July 1, 2001; 5(3): 373 - 400. [Abstract] [PDF]