|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Uses of expertise: sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news
Peter Conrad
Department of Sociology, MS-071, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, Conrad{at}brandeis.edu
Science journalists call upon experts for background and for clarification and comment on scientific findings. This paper examines how science writers choose and use experts, and it focuses on several cases of reporting about genetics and behavior. Our research included two sources of data: interviews with 15 science reporters and three print media samples of coverage of genetics and behavior—alcoholism (between 1980-1995), homosexuality (in 1993 and 1995), and mental illness (between 1970-1995). Science reporters seek relevant and specific experts for nearly every story. Good sources are knowledgeable, are connected to prestigious institutions, are direct and articulate and don't overqualify statements, and they return phone calls. The mean number of experts quoted was 2.8 per story, differing for alcoholism (3.5), homosexuality (2.8), and mental illness (2.6). Researchers and scientists predominated among experts quoted. Quotes were used to provide context, give legitimization, as explication, to provide a kind of balance, and to outline implications. For the homosexuality sample, a significantly greater percentage of activists and advocates were quoted (21 percent compared with 5 percent and 1 percent in other samples, X2 < 0.0001). "Lay" quotes for alcoholism and mental illness were minimal. Except for homosexuality, whose advocates are organized, those "affected" do not have a voice in genetics news stories.
Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 8, No. 4,
285-302 (1999)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/8/4/302
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
M. Augoustinos, A. Russin, and A. LeCouteur
Representations of the stem-cell cloning fraud: from scientific breakthrough to managing the stake and interest of science
Public Understanding of Science,
November 1, 2009;
18(6):
687 - 703.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Hinnant and M. E. Len-Rios
Tacit Understandings of Health Literacy: Interview and Survey Research With Health Journalists
Science Communication,
September 1, 2009;
31(1):
84 - 115.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Petersen, A. Anderson, S. Allan, and C. Wilkinson
Opening the black box: scientists' views on the role of the news media in the nanotechnology debate
Public Understanding of Science,
September 1, 2009;
18(5):
512 - 530.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Alcibar
Human Cloning and the Raelians: Media Coverage and the Rhetoric of Science
Science Communication,
December 1, 2008;
30(2):
236 - 265.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Nucci and R. Kubey
"We Begin Tonight With Fruits and Vegetables": Genetically Modified Food on the Evening News 1980-2003
Science Communication,
December 1, 2007;
29(2):
147 - 176.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Barr and R. McConkey
A different type of appointment: the experiences of parents who have children with intellectual disabilities referred for genetic investigation
Journal of Research in Nursing,
November 1, 2007;
12(6):
637 - 652.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Michelle
`Human clones talk about their lives': media representations of assisted reproductive and biogenetic technologies
Media Culture Society,
July 1, 2007;
29(4):
639 - 663.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Marks, N. Kalaitzandonakes, L. Wilkins, and L. Zakharova
Mass media framing of biotechnology news
Public Understanding of Science,
April 1, 2007;
16(2):
183 - 203.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Petersen
The genetic conception of health: is it as radical as claimed?
Health (London) ,
October 1, 2006;
10(4):
481 - 500.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. R. Bates
Public culture and public understanding of genetics: a focus group study
Public Understanding of Science,
January 1, 2005;
14(1):
47 - 65.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Valiverronen
Stories of the "medicine cow": representations of future promises in media discourse
Public Understanding of Science,
October 1, 2004;
13(4):
363 - 377.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Sankar, M. K. Cho, C. M. Condit, L. M. Hunt, B. Koenig, P. Marshall, S. S.-J. Lee, and P. Spicer
Genetic Research and Health Disparities
JAMA,
June 23, 2004;
291(24):
2985 - 2989.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Holliman
Media Coverage of Cloning: A Study of Media Content, Production and Reception
Public Understanding of Science,
April 1, 2004;
13(2):
107 - 130.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Mountcastle-Shah, E. Tambor, B. A. Bernhardt, G. Geller, R. Karaliukas, J. E. Rodgers, and N. A. Holtzman
Assessing Mass Media Reporting of Disease-Related Genetic Discoveries: Development of an Instrument and Initial Findings
Science Communication,
June 1, 2003;
24(4):
458 - 478.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Dumlao and S. Duke
The Web and E-Mail in Science Communication
Science Communication,
March 1, 2003;
24(3):
283 - 308.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Conrad and S. Markens
Constructing the 'Gay Gene' in the News: Optimism and Skepticism in the US and British Press
Health (London) ,
July 1, 2001;
5(3):
373 - 400.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
