This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (33) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bord, R. J. Articles by Fisher, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?

Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, rjb7{at}psu.edu

Robert E. O'Connor

Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, equipoise{at}psu.edu

Ann Fisher

Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, anf1{at}psu.edu

In a survey of 1,218 Americans, the key determinant of behavioral intentions to address global warming is a correct understanding of the causes of global warming. Knowing what causes climate change, and what does not, is the most powerful predictor of both stated intentions to take voluntary actions and to vote on hypothetical referenda to enact new government policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Identifying bogus causes (e.g., insecticides) correlates with the belief that the globe will warm, but is only weakly related to voluntary actions and not at all related to support for government policies. General pro-environmental beliefs and perceptions that global warming poses serious threats to society also help to explain behavioral intentions. The explanatory power of an air pollution framework is substantial in bivariate analyses, but has little explanatory power in multivariate analyses that include knowledge, risk perceptions, and general environmental beliefs. Translating public concern for global warming into effective action requires real knowledge. General environmental concern or concern for the negative effects of air pollution appear not to motivate people to support programs designed to control global warming.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, 205-218 (2000)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/301


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Whitmarsh What's in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of "climate change" and "global warming" Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2009; 18(4): 401 - 420. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E.-L. Sundblad, A. Biel, and T. Garling Knowledge and Confidence in Knowledge About Climate Change Among Experts, Journalists, Politicians, and Laypersons Environment and Behavior, March 1, 2009; 41(2): 281 - 302. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Kahlor and S. Rosenthal If We Seek, Do We Learn?: Predicting Knowledge of Global Warming Science Communication, March 1, 2009; 30(3): 380 - 414. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Bickerstaff, I. Lorenzoni, N.F. Pidgeon, W. Poortinga, and P. Simmons Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2008; 17(2): 145 - 169. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. T. Boykoff Media and scientific communication: a case of climate change Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 305(1): 11 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Corbett and J. L. Durfee Testing Public (Un)Certainty of Science: Media Representations of Global Warming Science Communication, December 1, 2004; 26(2): 129 - 151. [Abstract] [PDF]