This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (17) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Krosnick, J. A. Articles by Visser, P. S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion

Ohio State University, krosnick{at}osu.edu

Allyson L. Holbrook

Ohio State University

Penny S. Visser

Princeton University Department of Psychology and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs

Although global warming has been the subject of some public discussion since the turn of the 20^th Century, it was pushed into the national spotlight during the fall of 1997, when President Bill Clinton's administration instigated a campaign to build public support for the Kyoto treaty. To examine the effect of this campaign and the debate it sparked, we conducted two national surveys, one immediately before and the other immediately after the campaign. We addressed three questions: (1) What were Americans' beliefs and attitudes about global warming before the debate? (2) Did the debate catch the public's attention? and (3) Did the debate change people's beliefs and attitudes about global warming? We found that a majority of the American general public and of the global warming "issue public" endorsed the views advocated by President Clinton before the media campaign began. The debate did attract people's attention and strengthened the public's beliefs and attitudes. The debate produced almost no changes in public opinion when the nation's population is lumped together. But beneath this apparently calm surface, strong Democrats came to endorse the positions advocated by the Clinton administration, while strong Republicans were less inclined to endorse the administration's views.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, 239-260 (2000)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/303


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Ansolabehere and D. M. Konisky Public Attitudes Toward Construction of New Power Plants Public Opin Q, September 1, 2009; 73(3): 566 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Albertson and A. Lawrence After the Credits Roll: The Long-Term Effects of Educational Television on Public Knowledge and Attitudes American Politics Research, March 1, 2009; 37(2): 275 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Carvalho Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 223 - 243. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Grundmann Ozone and Climate: Scientific Consensus and Leadership Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 2006; 31(1): 73 - 101. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. B. Corbett and J. L. Durfee Testing Public (Un)Certainty of Science: Media Representations of Global Warming Science Communication, December 1, 2004; 26(2): 129 - 151. [Abstract] [PDF]