This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Weingart, P. Articles by Pansegrau, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media

Department of Sociology, Institute of Science and Technology Studies of the University of Bielefeld

Anita Engels

University of Bielefeld, Center for Environmental Science and Policy of Stanford University

Petra Pansegrau

This paper summarizes the results of a research project analyzing communication about global warming among those in the fields of science, politics, and the media in Germany between 1975 and 1995. The methodology of discourse analysis has been applied to investigate the changing perceptions of climate change over time and the ways in which it became an important issue on Germany's political agenda. The first part of the paper will briefly introduce the underlying theoretical assumptions and explain the multiple steps by which data covering a period of two decades have been collected and analyzed. In the second part, the paper will provide the reader with the main research results, indicating the usefulness of distinguishing among the separate discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. The results suggest that there are specific discourse dynamics common to each of the three spheres, as well as some important disparities among them. These findings will be illustrated by a selection of examples typical of the samples analyzed. Finally, the third part of the paper will discuss the broader theoretical and practical implications of these results, which suggest that modern societies must cope not only with environmental risks but also with the risks inherent in communication.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, 261-283 (2000)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/304


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				U. Olausson Global warming--global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2009; 18(4): 421 - 436. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. O'Neill and S. Nicholson-Cole "Fear Won't Do It": Promoting Positive Engagement With Climate Change Through Visual and Iconic Representations Science Communication, March 1, 2009; 30(3): 355 - 379. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Ungar Global Bird Flu Communication: Hot Crisis and Media Reassurance Science Communication, June 1, 2008; 29(4): 472 - 497. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. T. Boykoff Media and scientific communication: a case of climate change Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 305(1): 11 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Carvalho Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 223 - 243. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Grundmann Ozone and Climate: Scientific Consensus and Leadership Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 2006; 31(1): 73 - 101. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Valiverronen and I. Hellsten From "Burning Library" to "Green Medicine": The Role of Metaphors in Communicating Biodiversity Science Communication, December 1, 2002; 24(2): 229 - 245. [Abstract] [PDF]