This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hayes, B. C. Articles by Tariq, V. N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: a comparative study of four Anglo-American nations

Department of Sociology, b.hayes{at}queens-belfast.ac.uk

Vicki N. Tariq

School of Biology and Biochemistry

Despite a lack of empirical verification, research analysts and populist commentators have long assumed that a key factor in explaining anti-scientific attitudes among women is their greater disinterest and ignorance of scientific developments. Using nationally representative Anglo-American data from the 1993 International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) Environment Survey, the results of this analysis question that assumption. Women in the United States, Canada, Great Britain and New Zealand are indeed less knowledgeable and hold less favorable attitudes toward science than men. However, in all but the United States, these gender differences in scientific attitudes are due to male-female disparities in educational background and religious belief, not to variations in scientific knowledge. Thus, in Canada, Great Britain and New Zealand, it is not gender per se but rather differences in social background that explain citizens' views. A somewhat different pattern emerges in the United States. Here, it is differences in levels of scientific knowledge and not demographic background, including gender, which explains public variation in attitudes toward science. The implications of these findings for both research analysts and policy makers are briefly discussed.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 9, No. 4, 433-447 (2000)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Meisenberg Designer babies on tap? Medical students' attitudes to pre-implantation genetic screening Public Understanding of Science, March 1, 2009; 18(2): 149 - 166. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Allum, P. Sturgis, D. Tabourazi, and I. Brunton-Smith Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2008; 17(1): 35 - 54. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Camussi and C. Leccardi Stereotypes of working women: the power of expectations Social Science Information, March 1, 2005; 44(1): 113 - 140. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. C. von Roten Gender Differences in Attitudes toward Science in Switzerland Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2004; 13(2): 191 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Sturgis and N. Allum Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2004; 13(1): 55 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. C. Hayes Gender, Scientific Knowledge, and Attitudes toward the Environment: A Cross-National Analysis Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 2001; 54(3): 657 - 671. [Abstract] [PDF]