Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Understanding of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Persson, P.-E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Science centers are thriving and going strong!

Per-Edvin Persson

Director of Heureka, the Finnish Science Center, P.O. Box 166, FIN 01301 Vantaa, Finland, pelle{at}heureka.fi

In a critique of the science center movement, J. M. Bradburne (in Public Understanding of Science 7, no. 3 [July 1998]: 237-253) maintained that science centers were unwilling to adapt, and were therefore doomed. In this response, the author shows that science centers are adapting and changing. Science center attendance is growing worldwide, both in old and new institutions. Science centers typically operate from buildings, while providing services outside the site. There is a wide range of inventiveness in selecting sites, and, as a result, determining capital expenditure. Science centers are comparatively cost effective and viable. They typically depend on several sources of revenue. Through several examples, evidence of change in science centers is presented. Science centers likewise tend to have an individual flavor in different parts of the world. Science centers are attractive and competitive, and they cater to local audiences. Present day science centers should be considered third generation museums. The emphasis on hands-on exhibits in science centers may have limited the way in which science is depicted in science centers. Taken as a whole, science centers seem to be both sustainable and to provide value for money.

Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 9, No. 4, 449-460 (2000)
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/307
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Social Studies of ScienceHome page
S. D. Schmid
Celebrating Tomorrow Today: The Peaceful Atom on Display in the Soviet Union
Social Studies of Science, June 1, 2006; 36(3): 331 - 365.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
B. V. Lewenstein
Editorial: A decade of Public Understanding
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2002; 11(1): 1 - 4.
[PDF]