|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: bridging the ethnographic—survey research divide
Matthew C. Nisbet
School of Communication, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20016, USA, nisbetmc{at}gmail.com
Robert K. Goidel
Manship School of Mass Communication at Louisiana State University
Using the contemporary debate in the United States over embryonic stem cell research as a test case, we outline a theoretical framework that points to the central impact of value predispositions, schema, political knowledge, and forms of mass media use in shaping public perceptions of science. In the process, by proposing an alternative approach to the dominant science literacy model, we address the existing divide between survey-based and ethnographic studies. Analyzing nationally representative survey data collected in the US in the fall of 2003, our findings suggest that value predispositions related to Christian conservatism and social ideology, along with schema related to abortion and reservations about science, serve as primary influences on citizen evaluations of embryonic stem cell research and therapeutic cloning, while our measure of issue-specific political knowledge had no statistically significant impact. In addition, after all controls, attention to newspaper coverage along with various forms of genre-specific entertainment television use have unique influences on citizen evaluations, suggesting that the mass media provide an important part of the social context by which citizens judge controversial science. Other survey results since our data collection in 2003 lend support to our findings. Religious and ideological values appear to filter the influence of information disseminated by scientific institutions. We conclude by discussing future research that connects findings from ethnographic studies with survey-based approaches.
References
- Allum, N., Sturgis, P., Tabourazi, D. and Brunton-Smith, I. (2005) "A Meta-Analysis of Science Knowledge and Attitudes across Cultures," Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
- Allum, N.C., Boy, D. and Bauer, M.W. (2002) "European Regions and the Knowledge Deficit," in M. Bauer and G. Gaskell (eds) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy, pp. 224—43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Basalla, G. (1976) "Pop Science: The Depiction of Science in Popular Culture," in G. Holton and W. Blanpied (eds) Science and its Public, pp. 261—78. Boston: Beacon.
- Bauer, M. (2002) "Controversial Medical and Agri-Food Biotechnology: A Cultivation Analysis," Public Understanding of Science 11: 93—111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bauer, M. (2005a) "Distinguishing Red and Green Biotechnology: Cultivation Effects of the Elite Press," International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17(1): 63—89.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bauer, M. (2005b) "Public Perceptions and Mass Media in the Biotechnology Controversy," International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17(1): 5—22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bauer, M. and Bonfadelli, H. (2002) "Controversy, Media Coverage and Public Knowledge," in M. Bauer and G. Gaskell (eds) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy, pp. 149—78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bauer, M., Petkova, K. and Boyadjieva, P. (2000) "Public Knowledge of and Attitudes to Science: Alternative Measures that May End the `Science Wars,'" Science, Technology, and Human Values 1: 30—51.[CrossRef]
- Besley, J.C. and Shanahan, J. (2005) "Media Attention and Exposure in Relation to Support for Agricultural Biotechnology," Science Communication 26: 347—67.[Abstract]
- Blumer, J. and Katz, E., eds (1974) The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
- Brossard, D. and Nisbet, M.C. (in press) "Deference to Scientific Authority among a Low Information Public: Explaining American Opinion on Agricultural Biotechnology," International Journal of Public Opinion Research.
- Carroll, J. (2005) "Party Lines Shape Views of What's Morally Acceptable: Embryonic Stem Cell Research Sees Surge in Support among Democrats," Gallup News Service, 25 May.
- Collins, H. (1987) "Certainty and the Public Understanding of Science: Science on Television," Social Studies of Science 17: 689—713.[Abstract]
- Einsiedel, E. (2000) "Understanding `Publics' in the Public Understanding of Science," in M. Dierkes and C. Grote (eds) Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science, and Technology, pp. 205—16. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
- Ellison, C.G. and Musick, M.A. (1995) "Conservative Protestantism and Public-opinion Toward Science," Review of Religious Research 36: 245—62.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Epstein, S. (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Fiske, S.T. and Taylor, S.E. (1991) Social Cognition, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Gamson, W.A. and Modigliani, A. (1989) "Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach," American Journal of Sociology 95: 1—37.[CrossRef]
- Gaskell, G., Bauer, M., Durant, J. and Allum, N. (1999) "Worlds Apart? The Reception of Genetically-Modified Foods in Europe and the U.S," Science 285: 384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Hoover, S., Morgan, M., Signorelli, N., Cotugno, H.E. and Wuthnow, R. (1984) Religion and Television. Philadelphia: Annenberg School of Communications, University of Pennsylvania.
- Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M. and Signorelli, N. (1985) Television Entertainment and Viewers' Conceptions of Science, Report to National Science Foundation. Philadelphia: Annenberg School of Communications, University of Pennsylvania.
- Holbert, L.R., Kwak, N. and Shah, D.V. (2003a) "Environmental Concerns, Patterns of Television Viewing, and Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Integrating Models of Media Consumption and Effects," Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 47(2): 177—96.[CrossRef]
- Holbert, L.R., Shah, D.V. and Kwak, N. (2003b) "Political Implications of Prime-Time Drama and Sitcom Use: Genres of Representation and Opinions Concerning Women's Rights," Journal of Communication 53(1): 45—60.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Hoover, S.M. (1990) "Television, Religion, and Religious Television: Purposes and Cross-purposes," in N. Signorelli and M. Morgan (eds) Cultivation Analysis: New Directions in Media Effects Research, pp. 123—41. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
- Hornig, S. (1990) "Television's NOVA and the Construction of Scientific Truth," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7: 11—23.[Web of Science]
- Irwin, A. and Michael, M. (2003) Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. London: Open University Press.
- Irwin, A. and Wynne, B., eds (1996) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kallerud, E. and Ramberg, I. (2002) "The Order of Discourse in Surveys of Public Understanding of Science," Public Understanding of Science 11: 213—24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kim, S., Scheufele, D.A. and Shanahan, J.E. (2002) "Agenda-Setting, Priming, Framing and Second-Levels in Local Politics," Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 79(1): 7—25.
- Lee, C., Scheufele, D.A. and Lewenstein, B.V. (2005) "Public Attitudes Toward Emerging Technologies: Examining the Interactive Effects of Cognitions and Affect on Public Support for Nanotechnology," Science Communication 27(2): 240—67.[Abstract]
- Lodge, M., McGraw, K.M., Conover, P.J., Feldman, S. and Miller, A.H. (1991) "Where is the Schema? Critiques," American Political Science Review 85: 1357—80.[CrossRef]
- Markus, H. and Zajonc, R.B. (1985) "The Cognitive Perspective in Social Psychology," in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd edn, Vol. 1, pp. 137—230. New York: Random House.
- McLeod, D.M., Kosicki, G.M. and McLeod, J. (2002) "Resurveying the Boundaries of Political Communications Effects," in J. Bryant and D. Zillmann (eds) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, 2nd edn, pp. 215—67. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- McLeod, J.M. and Becker, L. (1974) "Testing the Validity of Gratifications Measures through Political Effects Analysis," in J.G. Blumler and E. Katz (eds) The Uses and Gratifications of Mass Communication, pp. 19—32. London: Faber.
- McLeod, J.M., Scheufele, D.A. and Moy, P. (1999) "Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation," Political Communication 16(3): 315—36.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Michael, M. (1996) "Ignoring Science: Discourses of Ignorance in the Public Understanding of Science," in A. Irwin and B. Wynne (eds) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, pp. 107—25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Miller, J.D. (1998) "The Measurement of Civic Scientific Literacy," Public Understanding of Science 7: 203—23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Miller, J.D. and Kimmel, L. (2001) Biomedical Communications: Purposes, Audiences, and Strategies New York: Academic Press.
- Miller, J.D., Pardo, R. and Niwa, F. (1997) Public Perceptions of Science and Technology: A Comparative Study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Chicago, IL: Chicago Academy of Sciences.
- National Bioethics Advisory Committee (NBAC) ( 1999) Ethical Issues in Human Stem Cell Research, Vol. 1. Rockville, MD: NBAC.
- Nielson, T.V., Jelsøe, E. and Öhman, S. (2002) "Traditional Blue and Modern Green Resistance," in M.W. Bauer and G. Gaskell (eds) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy, pp. 179—202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Nisbet, M.C. (2004a) "The Stem Cell Controversy: Towards a Model of Mediated Issue Development," Paper presented to the annual meetings of the International Communication Association.
- Nisbet, M.C. (2004b) "The Polls: Public Opinion about Stem Cell Research and Human Cloning," Public Opinion Quarterly 68(1): 132—55.
- Nisbet, M.C. (2005) "The Competition for Worldviews: Values, Information, and Public Support for Stem Cell Research," International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17(1): 90—112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Nisbet, M.C. and Lewenstein, B.V. (2002) "Biotechnology and the American Media: The Policy Process and the Elite Press, 1970 to 1999," Science Communication 23: 359—91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Nisbet, M.C., Scheufele, D.A., Shanahan, J.E., Moy, P., Brossard, D. and Lewenstein, B. (2002) "Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise? A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology," Communication Research 29: 504—608.
- Nisbet, M.C., Brossard, D. and Kroepsch, A. (2003) "Framing Science: The Stem Cell Controversy in an Age of Press/Politics," Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 8(2): 36—70.[CrossRef]
- Pan, Z. and Kosicki, G.M. (1993) "Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse," Political Communication 10: 55—75.
- Pew Center for the People and the Press (2005 ) "More See Benefits of Stem Cell Research: Opinions Divide along Religious Lines," 23 May. Philadelphia, PA. URL: http://people-press.org/commentary/display.php3?AnalysisID=111
- Popkin, S. (1991) The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Price, V. and Tewksbury, D. (1997) "News Values and Public Opinion: A Theoretical Account of Media Priming and Framing," in G.A. Barnett and F.J. Boster (eds) Progress in the Communication Sciences, pp. 173—212. New York: Ablex.
- Priest, S. (2001) "Misplaced Faith—Communication Variables as Predictors of Encouragement for Biotechnology Development," Science Communication 23(2): 97—110.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Priest, S., Bonfadelli, H. and Rusanen, M. (2004) "The `Trust Gap' Hypothesis: Predicting Support for Biotechnology Across National Cultures as a Function of Trust in Actors," Risk Analysis 23(4): 751—66.[Web of Science]
- Scheufele, D.A. (1999) "Framing as a Theory of Media Effects," Journal of Communication 49(1): 103—22.[Web of Science]
- Scheufele, D.A. (2000) "Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communication," Mass Communication and Society 3: 297—316.
- Scheufele, D.A. and Lewenstein, B. (2005) "The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies," Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7(6): 659—67.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Scheufele, D.A., Nisbet, M.C. and Brossard, D. (2003) "Pathways to Political Participation? Religion, Communication Contexts, and Mass Media," International Journal of Public Opinion Research 15(3): 300—24.[Abstract]
- Scheufele, D.A., Nisbet, M.C., Brossard, D. and Nisbet, E.C. (2004) "Social Structure and Citizenship: Examining the Impacts of Social Setting, Network Heterogeneity, and Informational Variables on Political Participation," Political Communication 21: 315—38.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Shrum, L.J. (2002) "Media Consumption and Perceptions of Social Reality: Effects and Underlying Processes," in J. Bryant and D. Zillmann (eds) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, pp. 69—95. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Slater, M.D., Rouner, D. and Long, M.A. (forthcoming) "Television Dramas and Support for Controversial Public Policies: Effects and Mechanisms," Journal of Communication.
- Sniderman, P.M., Brody, R.A. and Tetlock, P.E. (1991) Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Sturgis, P. and Allum, N. (2004) "Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes," Public Understanding of Science 13(1): 55—74.[Abstract]
- Turney, J. (1998) Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics, and Popular Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Wynne, B. (1992) "Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science," Public Understanding of Science 1: 281—304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Zaller, J. (1991) "Information, Values, and Opinions," American Political Science Review 85: 1215—37.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 16, No. 4,
421-440 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0963662506065558
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
H. Liu and S. Priest
Understanding public support for stem cell research: media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors
Public Understanding of Science,
November 1, 2009;
18(6):
704 - 718.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Hwang and B. G. Southwell
Science TV News Exposure Predicts Science Beliefs: Real World Effects Among a National Sample
Communication Research,
October 1, 2009;
36(5):
724 - 742.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Nisbet and D. A. Scheufele
What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions
Am. J. Botany,
October 1, 2009;
96(10):
1767 - 1778.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. O. Stewart, D. L. Dickerson, and R. Hotchkiss
Beliefs About Science and News Frames in Audience Evaluations of Embryonic and Adult Stem Cell Research
Science Communication,
June 1, 2009;
30(4):
427 - 452.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V.L. Peddie, M. Porter, C. Counsell, L. Caie, D. Pearson, and S. Bhattacharya
'Not taken in by media hype': how potential donors, recipients and members of the general public perceive stem cell research
Hum. Reprod.,
May 1, 2009;
24(5):
1106 - 1113.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
