This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0963662507078396v1 18/1/61    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hudson, N. Articles by Bharadwaj, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

"Public" perceptions of gamete donation: a research review

¹ Research Fellow in the School of Applied Social Sciences at De Montfort University.
² Professor of Social Science and Health at De Montfort University, Leicester.
³ Professor of Qualitative Health Research at the School of Medicine, Swansea University.
⁴ Director of the Mary Seaole Research Centre and UK Centre for Evidence in Ethnicity Health and Diversity
⁵ lecturer in Medical Sociology at the University of Edinburgh.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

	Abstract

This paper reviews the literature on "public" perceptions of the practice of gamete (egg and sperm) donation in the treatment of infertility. Despite regular "consultation" exercises in the UK on the manner in which infertility treatments should be regulated, there is little sense of how a range of public groups respond to developments in this area. The key themes from thirty-three articles, chapters and reports are discussed. The review reveals the limited nature of our current knowledge of public understandings of and attitudes towards gamete donation as a form of infertility treatment which has been readily available and widely practiced for many years. The review is critical of the methodological and epistemological basis of much of the work in this area and argues that there is a strong case for social scientific research to attempt to capture the perceptions of a wider range of people who are rarely included in formal public consultations and often similarly excluded from research studies.

First published on October 1, 2008, doi:10.1177/0963662507078396

Public Understanding of Science 2009;18:61.

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?