Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Understanding of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0963662507079760v1
18/3/338    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, S.
Right arrow Articles by Duensing, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Discussing dialogue: perspectives on the value of science dialogue events that do not inform policy

Sarah Davies1*, Ellen McCallie2, Elin Simonsson3, Jane L Lehr4, and Sally Duensing5

1 Research Associate in Durham University's Institute of Hazard and Risk Research, Durham.
2 Director of the Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).
3 Visitor Researcher at the Science Museum in London.
4 Assistant professor in the Department of Ethnic Studies and Department of Women's & Gender Studies at California Polytechnic State University.
5 Professor at King's College London in the Department of Education and Professional Studies.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

While theoretical work and empirical research have examined science policy informing "dialogue events," dialogue events that do not seek to inform public policy are under-theorized and under-researched, even though they are common and growing in popularity in the UK. We describe how, from a critical perspective, it may initially appear that such events cannot be justified without returning to the deficit model. But with this paper, we seek to open up a discussion about these non policy-informing events by arguing that there are in fact further ways to understand and frame them. We deliberately draw on different literatures and seek to make use of practitioner expertise within our discussion, in order to display several perspectives on the value of non-policy dialogue on science as sites of symmetrical individual or small-scale learning—rather than institutional learning—through social processes.

First published on October 1, 2008, doi:10.1177/0963662507079760

Public Understanding of Science 2009;18:338.

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?