This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0963662507079902v1 0963662507079902v2 18/3/354    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Felt, U. Articles by Strassnig, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Unruly ethics:: on the difficulties of a bottom-up approach to ethics in the field of genomics

¹ Department for Social Studies of Science at the University of Vienna.
² Department of Social Studies of Science and a lecturer at the University of Vienna, and the Vienna University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences.
³ Department of Social Studies of Science and is lecturer at the University of Vienna.
⁴ Department of Social Studies of Science and lecturer at the University of Vienna.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

	Abstract

This paper explores the difficulties of addressing ethical questions of genome research in a public engagement setting where laypeople and scientists met for a longer period of time. While professional ethics mostly ignores public meaning, we aimed at a bottom-up approach to ethics in order to broaden the way in which ethical aspects of genomics can be addressed. However, within this interaction we identified a number of difficulties that constrained an open discussion on ethical issues. Thus, we analyze how ethical issues were approached, framed, debated, displaced or closed. We then elaborate on the possibilities and limits of dealing with ethics in such a participatory setting. We conclude by hinting at what should be taken into consideration when approaching issues of science and ethics more "upstream."

First published on November 3, 2008, doi:10.1177/0963662507079902

Public Understanding of Science 2009;18:354.

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?