Public Understanding of Science -- Table of Contents (September 2009, 18 [5])

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

Receive this page by email each issue: [Sign up for eTOCs]

Contents: September 2009, Volume 18, No. 5 [Index by Author]
Other Issues:

Find articles in this issue containing these words:
[Search ALL Issues]

To see an article, click its [PDF] link. To add articles to your marked citations, check the boxes to the left of the titles you want, and click the 'Add to Marked Citations' button. To see one abstract at a time, click its [Abstract] link.

Regula Valérie Burri: Coping with uncertainty: Assessing nanotechnologies in a citizen panel in Switzerland
Public Understanding of Science 2009 18: 498-511. [Abstract] [PDF] [References] [Request Permission]

Alan Petersen, Alison Anderson, Stuart Allan, and Clare Wilkinson: Opening the black box: scientists’ views on the role of the news media in the nanotechnology debate
Public Understanding of Science 2009 18: 512-530. [Abstract] [PDF] [References] [Request Permission]

Evie Katz, Fiona Solomon, Wendy Mee, and Roy Lovel: Evolving scientific research governance in Australia: a case study of engaging interested publics in nanotechnology research
Public Understanding of Science 2009 18: 531-545. [Abstract] [PDF] [References] [Request Permission]

Dominique Brossard, Dietram A. Scheufele, Eunkyung Kim, and Bruce V. Lewenstein: Religiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology
Public Understanding of Science 2009 18: 546-558. [Abstract] [PDF] [References] [Request Permission]

Monika Kurath and Priska Gisler: Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio- and nanotechnology
Public Understanding of Science 2009 18: 559-573. [Abstract] [PDF] [References] [Request Permission]

Brigitte Nerlich and Richard James: "The post-antibiotic apocalypse" and the "war on superbugs": catastrophe discourse in microbiology, its rhetorical form and political function
Public Understanding of Science 2009 18: 574-590. [Abstract] [PDF] [References] [Request Permission]

Eefje Cuppen, Matthijs Hisschemöller, and Cees Midden: Bias in the exchange of arguments: the case of scientists’ evaluation of lay viewpoints on GM food
Public Understanding of Science 2009 18: 591-606. [Abstract] [PDF] [References] [Request Permission]

Fajun Chen, Yumin Shi, and Fei Xu: An analysis of the Public Scientific Literacy study in China
Public Understanding of Science 2009 18: 607-616. [Abstract] [PDF] [References] [Request Permission]

Mike Michael: Publics performing publics: of PiGs, PiPs and politics
Public Understanding of Science 2009 18: 617-631. [Abstract] [PDF] [References] [Request Permission]

Quick Search this Journal

Journal Navigation